An information event is quite sure as money, but provides no means for investors, which opened a meeting. See Helen Fry for more details and insights. Probably you may not imagine the resentment of everywhere angry investors, who will rightly uncomfortable questions. After all, an ordinary shareholders meeting would depending on the social contract anyway until October 31 to hold. There is therefore the possibility of here without overhead the shareholders the possibility to give to discuss with each other the right way in their funds. Lawyer Mahmud recommends investors which are of this opinion, to contradict the written decision (point 1 of the Arch of the voice). Only if this way, at least 20% of share capital contradict the decision in writing, may occur at all to a presence event. Consent to the approach to funding and participation in the capital increase, the assertion of claims for damages does not prevent! Finally, Mahmud indicates that partners who were wrongly advised before participation in the Fund must not fear to lose their potential claims against the consultant and founding partner of the Fund by consent or participation in the redevelopment. According to the case-law is the damage the participation itself, whose drawing was due to the erroneous advice. The aggrieved investor is neither obliged, still he loses itself to such restructuring decisions to participate actively this his rights against the consultant and other Anspruchsverpflichtete. It is important but, check for a possible limitation of a specialized attorney to leave if compensation claims. Nittel Firm specializing in banking and capital market law your contact Michael Minderjahn, lawyer Heidelberg: Hans-Bockler-Strasse 2 A, 69115 Heidelberg Tel.: 06221 915770 Fax: 06221 9157729 Munich: residential street 25, 80333 Munich Tel.: 089 25549850 Fax: 089 25549855 Hamburg: Dorpfeldstrasse 6, 22609 Hamburg Tel.: 040 53799042 Fax: 040 53799043 Berlin: Roth first breed 19, 10245 Berlin Tel: 030 95999280 Fax: 030 95999279